Post by merleymagpie on Jan 7, 2022 12:05:03 GMT
As I said before my post was made out of frustration at having the possibility to avoid relegation and it seemingly drifting towards it after the latest back to back defeats.
As I've said I understand all the caveats to our poor results and league postion. Indeed what manager that gets relieved of his postion can't point to bad luck, injuries suspensions, lack of adequate financial support. I would say nearly all, its because of with all of that as a back drop they couldn't get the results required, hence they are sacked. Again the remit when they took the job was the stay up if despite the apparent zero budget. They agreed to do the job if anything the horizon has changed positively and they are still failing, I guess I am just asking at this point what what point does the buck stop and at what point those who think a good job is being delivered will cease that line thinking because it seems loss of after loss and even as some alhave stated relegation wouldn't change their opinion which seems very odd. I would also add despite split views here opinions at games as Gemma alluded to are very different.
I am not sure who is wrong or right those who want change because they value the clubs status beyond any individual or those that despite loss after loss and still being bottom of table demand support of the manager seemingly irrespective of the results, league postion or inevitableconsequence of the above.
As I've said in another post I am not sure backing the manager regardless of how many defeats he racks up is truly in thr best interests on the club.
My support of the players and the team is steadfast, but I think we are in murky waters if 2 wins from 22 doesn't come under some serious scrutiny with consequences apparent.
But regardless with the minimal chance of the game being on tomorrow I will be there and hope for a victory and all faith to be restored.
As I've said I understand all the caveats to our poor results and league postion. Indeed what manager that gets relieved of his postion can't point to bad luck, injuries suspensions, lack of adequate financial support. I would say nearly all, its because of with all of that as a back drop they couldn't get the results required, hence they are sacked. Again the remit when they took the job was the stay up if despite the apparent zero budget. They agreed to do the job if anything the horizon has changed positively and they are still failing, I guess I am just asking at this point what what point does the buck stop and at what point those who think a good job is being delivered will cease that line thinking because it seems loss of after loss and even as some alhave stated relegation wouldn't change their opinion which seems very odd. I would also add despite split views here opinions at games as Gemma alluded to are very different.
I am not sure who is wrong or right those who want change because they value the clubs status beyond any individual or those that despite loss after loss and still being bottom of table demand support of the manager seemingly irrespective of the results, league postion or inevitableconsequence of the above.
As I've said in another post I am not sure backing the manager regardless of how many defeats he racks up is truly in thr best interests on the club.
My support of the players and the team is steadfast, but I think we are in murky waters if 2 wins from 22 doesn't come under some serious scrutiny with consequences apparent.
But regardless with the minimal chance of the game being on tomorrow I will be there and hope for a victory and all faith to be restored.